Under-Eye Hollow Filler, Front Cheek Filler, and HilloWave Treatment

For under-eye hollowness and front cheek (anterior cheekbone) volume loss, filler treatments are the primary recommendation. For generalized mid-cheek volume deficiency, HilloWave provides excellent improvement. This guide summarizes before-and-after results, recommended options, and expected longevity.
도훈's avatar
Nov 18, 2025
Under-Eye Hollow Filler, Front Cheek Filler, and HilloWave Treatment

For under-eye hollowness and front cheek (anterior cheekbone) volume loss, filler treatments are the primary recommendation. For generalized mid-cheek volume deficiency, HilloWave provides excellent improvement. This guide summarizes before-and-after results, recommended options, and expected longevity.

The under-eye and front cheek areas have thin skin and a higher likelihood of forming nodules, which is why hyaluronic acid fillers, HilloWave, and UltraColl are considered safe choices.

Meanwhile, for broader mid-cheek hollowing where more volume is required, HilloWave, Juvelook Volume, and Sculptra are more effective.


Hello, this is Dr. Kim Do-hoon from ODE Clinic.

Are you concerned about hollows under the eyes, the front cheeks (cheekbones), or overall cheek sagging?

Today, I’ve put together a guide for people like this, covering before-and-after results, recommended treatments for each area, as well as their effects and duration.

Area

Under-Eye, Front Cheek

Cheek Hollowing

Characteristics

Thin skin, high muscular movement

Thick skin, large volume needed

Concerns

Nodules, excessive collagen formation

Foreign body sensation, product spread

Recommended Options

Fillers, HilloWave, UltraColl

HilloWave, Juvelook Volume / Sculptra

Before And After Filler,HiloWave Treatment
Before and After Filler+HiloWave Treatment
  • Before: Sept 3, 2025

  • After: Under-eye + front cheek filler + HilloWave (Sept 15, 2025)

The under-eye and front cheek volumes were restored naturally, with noticeable improvement in overall cheek hollowing.


Under-Eye & Midface Volume Treatment Guide

1) Higher Risk of Nodules

The under-eye area has extremely thin skin with many muscles and ligament structures.
PLA or CaHA collagen stimulators tend to clump between these structures, increasing the risk of nodules.

2) Thin Skin Visibility

When nodules occur under thin skin, they become easily visible from the outside.

For these reasons, Fillers, HilloWave, and UltraColl—which have lower nodule risk—are preferred for the under-eye region.


(1) Fillers

Fillers allow precise control of injection amounts, making them ideal for delicate areas like the under-eye.

  • Front Cheek (Anterior Cheekbone):
    Requires deeper and larger volume placement →
    Juvederm Voluma, Restylane Volume (larger particle, stronger elasticity)

  • Under-Eye:
    Movement-sensitive area →
    Restylane Eyelight (small particle, strong tissue integration)

“Is filler unsafe?”

Many patients worry about fillers migrating or causing blindness.
However, with proper technique, these complications are extremely rare.
In fact, collagen stimulators remain in the body much longer, while hyaluronic acid fillers can be dissolved at any time, making them a safer option in many cases.

(2) HilloWave + UltraColl

For patients hesitant about fillers, low-nodule-risk collagen stimulators are an alternative.

  • HilloWave: Provides instant volume, then gradually converts to collagen → effective for front cheek enhancement

  • UltraColl: PDO-based micro-collagen stimulation → suitable for the under-eye area


Cheek Hollowing Treatment Guide

The mid-cheek region often requires large volume, and fillers may feel lumpy or create irregularities in severe hollowness.
Thus, HilloWave, Juvelook Volume, and Sculptra become more appropriate options.

Volume/Tightening Characteristics:

  • Fillers → Volume 100

  • HilloWave → Volume 50 + Tightening 50

  • Juvelook Volume / Sculptra → Volume 30 + Tightening 70

Therefore,

If your goal is to fill in hollow areas rather than simply boost skin elasticity,
HiloWave

If improving skin elasticity takes priority over adding volume,
Juvelook Volume or Sculptra

are recommended.


Longevity of Each Treatment

(1) Fillers

  • Duration of Effect: Approximately 1 year
    The more a treated area moves, the faster it breaks down.
    If you want the filler to last longer, a touch-up once a year is recommended.

(2) HilloWave

  • Duration of Effect: 6–9 months per session
    Even after 9 months, the effect doesn’t completely disappear, as some of it converts into collagen.
    To extend the effect of HiloWave, it is recommended to receive a total of 3 sessions at 3-month intervals.
    In this case, the effect can last for about 18 months.

(3) Juvelook Volume, Sculptra, UltraColl

  • Duration of Effect: About 2 years or more
    Collagen-stimulating treatments maintain their results for a relatively long time once volume has built up.
    However, unlike fillers, they do not provide immediate full volume, and the effect is more gradual.
    How much volume develops depends on the specific area of concern.


FAQ

Q. How is HilloWave different from fillers?

  • Fillers: Highly cross-linked, high molecular weight hyaluronic acid → strong immediate volume

  • HilloWave: Combination of high and low molecular weight hyaluronic acid

    • High molecular: immediate volume

    • Low molecular: stimulates collagen and adipocyte proliferation

This dual action provides both instant volume and long-term firmness enhancement.


Today’s comparison covered treatment options for under-eye hollowing, front cheek enhancement, and generalized cheek volume loss.


Because results vary widely by individual, an accurate diagnosis and consultation with an experienced medical professional is essential.


Work with your provider to create a personalized treatment plan that fits your facial structure and goals.


Author: Dr. Dohoon Kim, Chief Director of ODE Clinic
Specialty: Anti-aging (Lifting, Volumizing, etc.)

Share article

오드의원 강남